i am a little bit irritated: yes belonging is important, like psychological safety, but like there here could be an overstretch, like safetyism. what if people do seperate them, claiming their individuality and then don't want to pay the price that comes with that decision and complain about beeing separate, not welcomed, a lack of belonging?
In my organisation we have a Great People Tapestry to have "Flourishing People" and the first our three outcomes to achieve this is Belonging. So I fully support and relate to your article and thank you for sharing so many good practice ideas. This will really help to sharpen our tools.
i am a little bit irritated: yes belonging is important, like psychological safety, but like there here could be an overstretch, like safetyism. what if people do seperate them, claiming their individuality and then don't want to pay the price that comes with that decision and complain about beeing separate, not welcomed, a lack of belonging?
In my organisation we have a Great People Tapestry to have "Flourishing People" and the first our three outcomes to achieve this is Belonging. So I fully support and relate to your article and thank you for sharing so many good practice ideas. This will really help to sharpen our tools.